Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
630-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

630-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023036 50.880922)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022965 50.880915,-1.022968 50.880929,-1.022978 50.880941,-1.022994 50.880951,-1.023013 50.880958,-1.023035 50.880960,-1.023057 50.880958,-1.023077 50.880952,-1.023093 50.880942,-1.023104 50.880930,-1.023107 50.880916,-1.023104 50.880902,-1.023094 50.880889,-1.023079 50.880879,-1.023059 50.880873,-1.023037 50.880870,-1.023015 50.880872,-1.022995 50.880879,-1.022979 50.880888,-1.022969 50.880901,-1.022965 50.880915)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL